The Guru
Glossary and notes
Spectacular:
an impressive, large-scale display
Creed:
system of beliefs, opinions (especially religious)
Obstinate:
stubborn, refusing to change one’s opinion or chosen course of action
Condescending:
behaving in a manner that is undignified or below one’s level of importance,
behaving in a way that displays a sense of superiority
Over-scrupulous:
paying exaggeratedly great attention to details, extremely careful and thorough
He............fat:
a reference to the guru’s indiscretion in the matter of food habits, his
fondness for rich foods.
SHORT ANSWER TYPE
QUESTIONS
Q. 1 Write a brief (100 words)
character-sketch of the pseudo-guru referred to in the poem?
Ans.
In this poem, the pseudo-guru is an untrustworthy, ungrateful fellow who has no
love for the poor people and servants. He is discourteous to his disciples. He
thinks himself superior to others. He is very impolite to the visitors
especially if they are men. He is greedy and materialistic. He prefers the
foreigners more because they give more money than the native poor people. He
himself checks the accounts of the ashram. He has no control over his desires.
He has grown fat because he loves rich food. Thus the poet presents a satirical
picture of a pseudo- guru who himself never acts upon what he preaches.
Q.2 What has been the past of ‘the
saint’?
Ans.
He led a life of an ordinary man. His past had been sinful. He had not done
anything extraordinary in his past.
Q3. What type of life is he living now?
Ans.
He is living a life of hypocrisy in the present. He is not a true guru. He is
arrogant, discourteous and materialistic. He has no control over his desires
Q.4 Why does the poet say: “We no
longer smile” in line 23?
Ans.
After observing the hypocritical ways of the so-called guru, the poet says that
they no longer feel amused. At first, they were quite impressed and blindly
followed him. But now, this pseudo-guru does not inspire them any longer.
Q.5 What makes the poet conclude that
there is no hope for us?
Ans.
The poet feels highly distressed to see how the pseudo-guru has taken the
advantage of the poor ignorant people. This guru himself does not act upon what
he preaches. He no longer inspires them. The poet concludes that if the
so-called saints lead an unscrupulous life, there can be no hope for the common
people.
OBJECTIVE TYPE
QUESTIONS
Q.1 Name the poet who has written the
poem ‘GURU’?
Ans.
Nissim Ezekiel.
Q.2 What kind of life did the saint
lead in the past years?
Ans.
He led a simple life.
Q.3 How is the Guru’s attitude towards
the foreigners?
Ans.
He is very polite to them.
Q.4 Why does he favour the foreigner?
Ans.
He favours the foreigners because they give him more money than the native poor
people.
Q.5 Which aspect of Guru’s personality
shows that he is money minded?
Ans.
He is very particular in checking the accounts of the Ashram.
ABOUT THE POET Nissim Ezekiel (1924-2004)
Ø
Nissim Ezekiel was an Indian Jewish poet, actor, playwright, art critic and
editor.
Ø
He is considered as father of post- independence and modern poetry of India.
Ø
Major themes of his literary work:
Ø
Indian Contemporary Scene.
Ø
Modern Urban Life.
Ø
Human Relationships.
Ø
Awards:
Ø
Padma Shri in 1988
Ø
Sahitya academy award in 1983
GURU (Nissim Ezekiel)
The
saint, we are told,
once
lived a life of sin – nothing spectacular, of course,
just
the usual things.
We
smile, we are not surprised.
Unlikely
though it seem,
we
too one day
may
grow up like him,
droppings
our follies
like
old clothes or creed.
But
then we learn
the
saint is still a faithless friend,
obstinate
in argument,
ungrateful
for favours done,
hard
with servants and the poor,
discourteous
to disciples,
especially
men,
condescending,
even rude
to
visitors (except the foreigners)
and
over-scrupulous in checking
the
accounts of the ashram.
He
is also rather fat.
Witnessing
the spectacle
we
no longer smile.
If
saints are like this
what
hope is there then for us?
SUMMARY
The
poem ‘GURU’ is an excellent poem exposing fake gurus. The poet exposes
hypocrisy and deception in India in the name of religion. In this poem, he
cites an example of such pseudo-guru. This so-called saint, whom the people
follow, once lived an ordinary life. There was nothing unusual in his past
life. As this man has elevated himself to a holy person, his followers gets
hopeful that they, too, would become like him by improving themselves. However,
soon they learn that this so called guru is untrustworthy and ungrateful
fellow.
The
pseudo-guru has no love for the poor people and very rude to his disciples. He
is very obstinate in arguments. He is very discourteous and faithless. He does
not acknowledge the favours done to him. He is very arrogant. He thinks himself
superior to others. He is very discourteous to the visitors, especially men. He
shows affection to the foreigners more because they give more money than the
native poor people. He is materialistic and checks the accounts of the ashram
himself. In this matter, he does not trust others. He has grown fat as he is
very fond of rich food. Thus he has no control over his desires.
After
observing all this, the poet says that they no longer feel amused. This
pseudo-guru does not inspire them anymore. This disheartening spectacle dashes
all the hopes of the common people. The poet concludes that if the so called
saints lead an unscrupulous life, there can be no hope for the common people.
CENTRAL IDEA
The
poem GURU exposes hypocrisy and deception in India in the name of religion.
Here spiritual leaders or gurus are considered next to God. Such pseudo-gurus
exploit and deceive the innocent people who follow them blindly and trust them.
Such people have made religion their business. They know how to fleece the
ignorant people for their personal benefits. They prefer foreigners as they
give more money than the native people. They cheat people with their empty
speech. These pseudo-gurus are ungrateful fellows who never acknowledge the
favours done to them. They themselves never act upon what they preach. Through
this poem, the poet wants to aware the common people of the unscrupulousness of
such so-called gurus.
EXPLANATION WITH
REFERENCE TO THE CONTEXT
The
saint, we are told,
once
lived a life of sin –
nothing
spectacular, of
course,
just
the usual things.
We
smile, we are not
surprised.
Unlikely
though it seem,
we
too one day
may
grow up like him,
droppings
our follies
like
old clothes or creed.
Reference
to the context: These lines have been taken from the poem ‘GURU’, composed by
Nissim Ezekiel. In this poem, the poet exposes the hypocrisy and deception of
the pseudo-gurus in the name of religion. They deceive the innocent people who
blindly follow them and trust them.
Explanation:
In these lines the poet says that the people have come to know about the past
life of the guru. This guru once lived a life of sin. He was just an ordinary
human being. There was nothing unusual in his past life. Hearing this, the
people does not feel surprised. They become hopeful that someday they, too,
would give up their follies exactly as the old clothes are discarded. It seems
to them impossible as they are very ordinary people. Only the guru is capable
of doing this. But still they hope for a better future.
But
then we learn
the
saint is still a faithless friend,
obstinate
in argument,
ungrateful
for favours done,
hard
with servants and the poor,
discourteous
to disciples,
especially
men,
condescending,
even rude
to
visitors (except the foreigners)
and
over-scrupulous in checking
the
accounts of the ashram.
He
is also rather fat
Explanation: In
these lines the poet tells us that the guru is a hypocrite. He is still a
faithless friend. He behaves friendly with people, but at the same time he
deceives them. He is always adamant in his arguments. He is an ungrateful
fellow who does not acknowledge the favours done to him. He is very rude to his
servants and the poor people. He is rude to his disciples and discourteous even
to the visitors. He thinks himself superior to them. He favours women and
foreigners. He is such a greedy person that he himself checks the accounts of
the ashram. He has grown fat because of his fondness for rich food. Thus he has
no control over his desires.
Witnessing
the spectacle
we
no longer smile.
If
saints are like this
what
hope is there then for us?
Explanation: In
these lines the poet tells us that after observing the hypocrisy of the so-called
guru, people no longer feel amused. They feel highly distressed to see how the
fake spiritual guru has taken the advantage of the ignorant people. He does not
inspire them any longer. This disheartening spectacle dashes all the hopes of
the common people. The poet concludes that if the so- called saints lead an
unscrupulous life, there can be no hope for the common people.